Why Occentra
Why organisations compare Occentra and Apollo Professional
Both platforms are designed for modern occupational health delivery. Apollo Professional describes hundreds of pre-built forms and templates, three dedicated portals with custom branding (HR/manager portal with reports and messaging, employee portal with appointments and advice, plus a clinician portal), and states that customers can be fully set up within two working days. Occentra positions versioned configuration and an explicit Referral-to-Case operating model that keeps historical meaning intact as the service evolves.
01
Versioned configuration versus pre-built libraries
Occentra treats Form Templates and controlled values as account configuration that administrators publish, version and maintain. Apollo Professional describes hundreds of pre-built forms, templates and questionnaires. Pre-built libraries can accelerate initial deployment; versioning ensures changes are explicit and historical meaning is preserved as the service evolves.
02
Referral-to-Case as the operating spine
Clients, Employees, Referrals, Cases, Tasks, appointments, Forms, Documents and Reports are distinct concepts in Occentra. A Referral becomes a Case when accepted, and that structure keeps turnaround and accountability measurable at each step.
03
Structured records for long-term reporting
Occentra stores Form answers against published, versioned templates as structured data. Reporting draws on operational records rather than aggregated form outputs, so the meaning of fitness decisions and screening answers survives when a service changes what it asks.
04
Configuration that grows with the service
Occentra is developed as one coherent platform. New capability is added to the same operating model, so the system your team learns at implementation is the system that grows with the service. The configuration model stays consistent rather than depending on pre-built library updates.